Stephen L. Wright

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen L. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Social Psychology 396
  • Safety Research 153
  • Applied Psychology 67
  • Communication 93
  • Clinical Psychology 226
Replace Veerle Brenninkmeijer with:
Veerle Brenninkmeijer Netherlands
Gisela Mohr Germany
Francis Cheung Hong Kong
Lisa E. Baranik United States
Carrie S. Hurst United States
Kimberly E. O’Brien United States
C.M. van der Heijde Netherlands
Gretchen R. Vogelgesang United States
Hilde Hetland Norway
Elena Marta Italy
Stephen L. Wright relative to Veerle Brenninkmeijer Netherlands Veerle Brenninkmeijer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Veerle Brenninkmeijer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Wright. The network helps show where Stephen L. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen L. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen L. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Stephen L. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012190
2 2012138
3 2012130
4 201475
5 201074
6 200972
7 201164
8 199356
9 201347
10 200844
11 200642
12
Valuing Wall Street: Protecting Wealth in Turbulent Markets
200032
13 201726
14 201524
15 201323
16
Retention of infant CPR instruction by parents.
198922
17 201022
18 201418
19 200718
20 201915

About Stephen L. Wright

Stephen L. Wright is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Career Development and Diversity (8 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (396 citations), Safety Research (153 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations), Communication (93 citations) and Clinical Psychology (226 citations). Stephen L. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Jenkins‐Guarnieri, Kristin M. Perrone, Brian D. Johnson, Brian D. Johnson, Robert W. Ritzi, Jens K. Roehrich, James Barlow, Karen Kesten, Christine Norton and Philip A. Perrone. Their work appears in journals such as The Career Development Quarterly, Journal of Career Development, journal for the education of the gifted, Psychology of Popular Media Culture and Journal of Counseling & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact