Stephen L. Wright

34 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen L. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Social Psychology 389
  • Safety Research 139
  • Applied Psychology 72
  • Communication 91
  • Clinical Psychology 229
Replace Gisela Mohr with:
Gisela Mohr Germany
C.M. van der Heijde Netherlands
Francis Cheung Hong Kong
Kimberly E. O’Brien United States
Hongjian Cao China
Gretchen R. Vogelgesang United States
Hilde Hetland Norway
Brian W. Swider United States
Ian M. Katz United States
Jan A. Feij Netherlands
Stephen L. Wright relative to Gisela Mohr Germany Gisela Mohr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Gisela Mohr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Wright. The network helps show where Stephen L. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen L. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen L. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Stephen L. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012182
2 2012130
3 2012121
4 201072
5 201470
6 200967
7 201158
8 199353
9 200845
10 201344
11 200640
12
Valuing Wall Street: Protecting Wealth in Turbulent Markets
200028
13 201725
14 201322
15
Retention of infant CPR instruction by parents.
198921
16 201521
17 201417
18 201017
19 200714
20 202012

About Stephen L. Wright

Stephen L. Wright is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Career Development and Diversity (8 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (389 citations), Safety Research (139 citations), Applied Psychology (72 citations), Communication (91 citations) and Clinical Psychology (229 citations). Stephen L. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Jenkins‐Guarnieri, Kristin M. Perrone, Brian D. Johnson, Brian D. Johnson, Robert W. Ritzi, Karen Kesten, Christine Norton, James Barlow, Philip A. Perrone and Jens K. Roehrich. Their work appears in journals such as The Career Development Quarterly, Journal of Career Development, Journal of Counseling & Development, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development and Psychology of Popular Media Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact