Winnie Wade

1.7k citations
26 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Winnie Wade

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Winnie Wade
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Family Practice 449
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 934
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 247
  • General Health Professions 268
Replace Nu Viet Vu with:
Nu Viet Vu Switzerland
Georgette A. Stratos United States
Anneke Kramer Netherlands
R. M. Harden United Kingdom
Elizabeth Bernabeo United States
Elaine F. Dannefer United States
Heather Armson Canada
Angel Centeno Argentina
Richard G. Tiberius Canada
Andrew K. Hall Canada
Winnie Wade relative to Nu Viet Vu Switzerland Nu Viet Vu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nu Viet Vu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Winnie Wade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Winnie Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winnie Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winnie Wade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Winnie Wade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winnie Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winnie Wade. The network helps show where Winnie Wade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Winnie Wade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Winnie Wade Line = papers co-authored together Winnie Wade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011239
2 2009238
3 2008199
4 2011169
5 200382
6 199579
7 199827
8 200822
9 199320
10 201117
11 201317
12 199617
13 201416
14 201116
15 201315
16 200714
17
A Comparative Study of Young People's Ideals in Five Countries.
198511
18 20199
19 19888
20 19877

About Winnie Wade

Winnie Wade is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Education and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers), Radiology practices and education (7 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (449 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (934 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (247 citations) and General Health Professions (268 citations). Winnie Wade has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Wilkinson, Jim Crossley, Gavin Johnson, George Cowan, Peter Mills, Andrew Wragg, James Crossley, James Wilkinson, Geraint Fuller and Ming‐Jung Ho. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Medicine, Medical Education, Medical Teacher, Postgraduate Medical Journal and Educational Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact