Fred Hafferty

780 citations
9 papers · 566 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Hafferty

8 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Fred Hafferty
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Family Practice 72
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 340
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 89
  • General Health Professions 143
Replace Hiroshi Nishigori with:
Hiroshi Nishigori Japan
Linda Lesky United States
Alexander W. Chessman United States
Alessandra Lo Scalzo Italy
Merijn Godefrooij Netherlands
Maria Clay United States
Anne Simmenroth-Nayda Germany
Miguel Julião Portugal
Tanya MacLeod Canada
Carol F. Capello United States
Fred Hafferty relative to Hiroshi Nishigori Japan Hiroshi Nishigori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Hiroshi Nishigori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Hafferty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Hafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Hafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Hafferty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Hafferty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Hafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Hafferty. The network helps show where Fred Hafferty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Hafferty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Hafferty Line = papers co-authored together Fred Hafferty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2011255
2 2013230
3 200634
4 198826
5 20057
6 20037
7 20186
8 20211
9 20240

About Fred Hafferty

Fred Hafferty is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacology, Family Practice and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (72 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (340 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations) and General Health Professions (143 citations). Fred Hafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ed Peile, Neil Johnson, Samantha Johnson, Vimmi Passi, Scott M. Wright, Matthew C. Holtman, Charlotte E. Rees, Sylvia R. Cruess, Olle ten Cate and Tim Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Academic Medicine and Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact