William Wolf

104 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

William Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • General Psychology 52
  • Food Science 644
  • Organic Chemistry 720
  • Virology 93
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 310
Replace Graham Jamieson with:
Graham Jamieson United States
W. Rohde Germany
Keiko Kashiwagi Japan
David S. Robinson United Kingdom
Mark E. Rogers United States
Stephen W. White United States
Robert E. Campbell Canada
Laurent Boyer France
Chun‐Hung Lin Taiwan
David M. Lawson United Kingdom
William Wolf relative to Graham Jamieson United States Graham Jamieson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Graham Jamieson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Wolf. The network helps show where William Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Wolf Line = papers co-authored together William Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990223
2 2013210
3 2017199
4 1966173
5 2014142
6 1986108
7 1953106
8 199996
9 201589
10 195889
11 201687
12 195980
13 199174
14 201974
15 196268
16 196568
17 196765
18 195763
19 195661
20 200057

About William Wolf

William Wolf is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Plant Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (15 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (13 papers), Phytase and its Applications (10 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (8 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (7 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (6 papers) and Food composition and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (52 citations), Food Science (644 citations), Organic Chemistry (720 citations), Virology (93 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (310 citations). William Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include F. Dean Toste, Matthew S. Winston, David Briggs, J. J. Rackis, A. K. Smith, Aud Nome Dueland, Mary Wellish, Ravi Mahalingam, Randall J. Cohrs and Robert H. Grubbs. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, American Journal of Psychotherapy and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact