Mark E. Rogers

69 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Mark E. Rogers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Microbiology 248
  • General Psychology 20
  • Immunology 313
  • Organic Chemistry 432
  • Oncology 309
Replace Robert Blumenthal with:
Robert Blumenthal United States
D. H. Williams United States
Richard C. Page United States
Wentao Li China
J. David Warren United States
Kiyoshi Ikeda Japan
Nejat Düzgüneş United States
Ishwar Singh India
Kang Chen United States
Jacques Bolard France
Mark E. Rogers relative to Robert Blumenthal United States Robert Blumenthal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Blumenthal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Rogers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Rogers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Rogers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Rogers. The network helps show where Mark E. Rogers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Rogers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Rogers Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Rogers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998465
2 2000300
3 2000188
4 2010159
5 1990145
6 1996107
7 198776
8 200072
9 199671
10 201467
11 200366
12 198260
13 199158
14 199257
15 198853
16 198146
17 199544
18 198340
19 198839
20 199737

About Mark E. Rogers

Mark E. Rogers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Ophthalmology, Spectroscopy and Pharmacology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (9 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (5 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (248 citations), General Psychology (20 citations), Immunology (313 citations), Organic Chemistry (432 citations) and Oncology (309 citations). Mark E. Rogers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anne Dell, Howard R. Morris, Maria Panico, Gary R. Weisman, Edward H. Wong, Oliver Billker, Viv Lindo, Robert E. Sinden, Thanai Paxton and Philippe Bulet. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Carbohydrate Research, Journal of Chromatography A, Glycobiology and Journal of Counseling Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact