William Ray Smith
Impact in
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
-
- Reading and Literacy Development
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Memory Processes and Influences 1
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 3
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience 3
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Mark A. Runco (2 shared papers)Gayle T. Dow (1 shared paper)Sara W. Smith (1 shared paper)Susan E. Hall (1 shared paper)George W. Rebok (1 shared paper)Mary Anne Alvin (1 shared paper)Steven M. Wilson (2 shared papers)Kay Bathurst (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Personality and Individual Differences (4 papers)Experimental Aging Research (1 paper)Creativity Research Journal (1 paper)Discourse Processes (1 paper)Intelligence (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Ray Smith
8 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 236
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 108
- Social Psychology 46
- General Decision Sciences 4
Countries citing papers authored by William Ray Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Ray Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ray Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ray Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Ray Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ray Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ray Smith. The network helps show where William Ray Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside William Ray Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 6 |
About William Ray Smith
William Ray Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Molecular Biology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper) and Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (236 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations), Social Psychology (46 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). William Ray Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Runco, Gayle T. Dow, Sara W. Smith, Susan E. Hall, George W. Rebok, Mary Anne Alvin, Steven M. Wilson, Kay Bathurst, Arthur C. Graesser and Scott P. Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Experimental Aging Research, Creativity Research Journal, Discourse Processes and Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.