Discourse Processes

1.3k papers and 42.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Discourse Processes in the last decades have received a total of 42.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Discourse Processes usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (622 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (551 papers) and Language and Linguistics (508 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (445 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (420 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (335 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Discourse Processes are Thomas K. Landauer, Peter W. Foltz, Danielle S. McNamara, Darrell Laham, Walter Kintsch, Melanie C. Green, Tom Trabasso, Raymond W. Gibbs, Edward J. O’Brien and Ted Sanders.

In The Last Decade

Discourse Processes

1.2k papers receiving 37.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Discourse Processes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Discourse Processes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Discourse Processes.

Countries where authors publish in Discourse Processes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Discourse Processes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Discourse Processes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Discourse Processes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026