William E. Lewis

908 citations
29 papers · 596 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Lewis

28 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

William E. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Software 62
  • Atmospheric Science 212
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 149
  • Literature and Literary Theory 92
  • Global and Planetary Change 143
Replace Jamie Smith with:
Jamie Smith United States
Gwo‐Haur Hwang Taiwan
Cinzia Cervato United States
James King United States
John Schiller Australia
Sherwood Wang United States
Qi Shen China
Amelito Enriquez United States
Abdul Gafur Marzuki Indonesia
Xiaolei Wang China
William E. Lewis relative to Jamie Smith United States Jamie Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jamie Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Lewis. The network helps show where William E. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together William E. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009116
2 200084
3 201664
4 200538
5 201937
6 200736
7 201826
8 200425
9 201823
10 201722
11 202021
12 201120
13 201715
14
Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement, Second Edition
200414
15 200913
16 20118
17 20046
18 20205
19 20185
20 20205

About William E. Lewis

William E. Lewis is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (9 papers), Climate variability and models (8 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (5 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (62 citations), Atmospheric Science (212 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (149 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (92 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (143 citations). William E. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ralph P. Ferretti, Christopher S. Velden, Luca Delle Monache, Stefano Alessandrini, Christopher M. Rozoff, Wayne Bresky, Steven Wanzong, Jaime Daniels, Robert S. Webb and Bette L. Otto‐Bliesner. Their work appears in journals such as Atmosphere, Monthly Weather Review, Weather and Forecasting, Reading & Writing Quarterly and Children s Literature in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact