Global and Planetary Change

1.4M papers and 39.8M indexed citations i.

About

1.4M papers covering Global and Planetary Change have received a total of 39.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Climate variability and models, Marine and fisheries research and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics and also cover the fields of Atmospheric Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Atmospheric Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. Some of the most active scholars covering Global and Planetary Change are E.M. Southern, Kevin E. Trenberth, Graham D. Farquhar, P. D. Jones, Richard Shine, Kerry Emanuel, John M. Wallace, Peter B. Reich, Aiguo Dai and Carl Folke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Global and Planetary Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Global and Planetary Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Global and Planetary Change.

Countries where authors publish papers about Global and Planetary Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Global and Planetary Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Global and Planetary Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global and Planetary Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025