Weather and Forecasting

3.0k papers and 93.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Weather and Forecasting in the last decades have received a total of 93.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Weather and Forecasting usually cover Atmospheric Science (2.8k papers), Global and Planetary Change (2.4k papers) and Oceanography (480 papers) specifically the topics of Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (2.4k papers), Climate variability and models (2.0k papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Weather and Forecasting are Charles A. Doswell, Mark DeMaria, Harold E. Brooks, Hans Hersbach, Allan H. Murphy, John Kaplan, John A. Knaff, William A. Gallus, Erik N. Rasmussen and Joseph T. Schaefer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Weather and Forecasting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Weather and Forecasting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Weather and Forecasting.

Countries where authors publish in Weather and Forecasting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Weather and Forecasting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Weather and Forecasting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weather and Forecasting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025