William E. Leigh

1.3k citations
40 papers · 987 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Leigh

31 papers receiving 902 citations

Peers

William E. Leigh
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Management Science and Operations Research 468
  • Finance 155
  • Management Information Systems 128
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 15
  • Signal Processing 117
Replace Vicente Liern with:
Vicente Liern Spain
Desheng Dash Wu China
Rainer Göb Germany
Qiming Li China
A. de Korvin United States
Juuso Liesiö Finland
C. Zopounidis Greece
Woojin Chang South Korea
Georgios Sermpinis United Kingdom
Robert R. Trippi United States
William E. Leigh relative to Vicente Liern Spain Vicente Liern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Vicente Liern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Leigh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Leigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Leigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Leigh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Leigh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Leigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Leigh. The network helps show where William E. Leigh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside William E. Leigh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Leigh Line = papers co-authored together William E. Leigh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002220
2 2003130
3 2004123
4 200297
5 199479
6 200250
7 200450
8 200349
9 200235
10 200731
11
Decision support and expert systems
198630
12 198522
13 200111
14 200110
15 20019
16 20018
17
Distributed intelligence: Trade-offs and decisions for computer information systems
19876
18 20006
19 19944
20 20043

About William E. Leigh

William E. Leigh is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 40 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stock Market Forecasting Methods (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (468 citations), Finance (155 citations), Management Information Systems (128 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (15 citations) and Signal Processing (117 citations). William E. Leigh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Russell L. Purvis, Mario Paz, James M. Ragusa, Tom Roberts, Gordon E. McCray, Ross Hightower, Michael E. Doherty, Michael A. Meador, J. C. Scaiano and Peter John Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Structural Dynamics, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Expert Systems with Applications, Decision Support Systems and Information Technology and Libraries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact