Information Technology and Libraries

559 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 559 papers published in Information Technology and Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Technology and Libraries usually cover Information Systems (356 papers), Library and Information Sciences (90 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (80 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (120 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (107 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Technology and Libraries are Irvin R. Katz, Nancy H. Dewald, Jody Condit Fagan, Louise F. Spiteri, Judy Jeng, John Carlo Bertot, Paul T. Jaeger, Michael Ridley, Jason Vaughan and Frederick G. Kilgour.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Technology and Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Technology and Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Technology and Libraries.

Countries where authors publish in Information Technology and Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Technology and Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Technology and Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Technology and Libraries more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025