Information Technology and Libraries

6.0k citations
581 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Library Science and Information Systems

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 58
    • Library Science and Administration 47
    • Web and Library Services 118
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 111
    • Library Science and Information Systems 66
    • Research Data Management Practices 41

Information Technology and Libraries

450 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Information Technology and Libraries
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.1k
  • Information Systems 3.4k
  • Communication 703
  • Information Systems and Management 631
  • Computer Science Applications 466
Replace Journal of Web Librarianship with:
Journal of Web Librarianship United States
The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances United States
Internet Reference Services Quarterly United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
College & Undergraduate Libraries United States
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship United States
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology United States
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication India
Public & Access Services Quarterly United States
Information Technology and Libraries relative to Journal of Web Librarianship United States Journal of Web Librarianship's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Journal of Web Librarianship · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Information Technology and Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Technology and Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Technology and Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Technology and Libraries more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Information Technology and Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Technology and Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Technology and Libraries.

About Information Technology and Libraries

The 581 papers published in Information Technology and Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Information Technology and Libraries usually cover Library and Information Sciences (88 papers), Information Systems (363 papers), Conservation (48 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (16 papers) and Computer Science Applications (31 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (118 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (111 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (66 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (58 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (48 papers), Library Science and Administration (47 papers), Research Data Management Practices (41 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Technology and Libraries are Irvin R. Katz, Jody Condit Fagan, Judy Jeng, John Carlo Bertot, Louise F. Spiteri, Paul T. Jaeger, Michael Ridley, Jason Vaughan, Frederick G. Kilgour and Sharon Q. Yang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact