Structural Dynamics

6.2k citations
562 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Radiation top 5%
    • Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
    • X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis

Papers in

    • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications 117
    • Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques 86
    • X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis 48

Structural Dynamics

479 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Structural Dynamics
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Structural Biology 1.2k
  • Radiation 1.1k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 541
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.3k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 471
Replace Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences with:
Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences United States
Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials India
Nature Reviews Physics United States
Annual Review of Biophysics United States
Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics United States
Microscopy Microanalysis Microstructures France
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry United States
Nature Reviews Chemistry United States
Advances in imaging and electron physics United States
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence China
Structural Dynamics relative to Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences United States Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Structural Dynamics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Structural Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Structural Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structural Dynamics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Structural Dynamics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Structural Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Structural Dynamics.

About Structural Dynamics

The 562 papers published in Structural Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Structural Dynamics usually cover Structural Biology (117 papers), Radiation (109 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (43 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (174 papers) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (44 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (117 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (86 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (82 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (68 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (59 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (48 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (45 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Structural Dynamics are Majed Chergui, Mario Paz, William Leigh, John C. H. Spence, Marius Schmidt, Thomas Elsaesser, Brent L. Nannenga, Philippe Wernet, Philip Coppens and John R. Helliwell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact