Decision Support Systems

3.9k papers and 174.1k indexed citations

About

The 3.9k papers published in Decision Support Systems in the last decades have received a total of 174.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Decision Support Systems usually cover Artificial Intelligence (1.2k papers), Management Science and Operations Research (986 papers) and Information Systems (835 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Marketing and Social Media (414 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (364 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Decision Support Systems are Dan J. Kim, Christy M.K. Cheung, H. Raghav Rao, Chao‐Min Chiu, Meng‐Hsiang Hsu, Salvatore T. March, Anol Bhattacherjee, Gerald F. Smith, Dursun Delen and Eric T.G. Wang.

In The Last Decade

Decision Support Systems

3.7k papers receiving 162.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Decision Support Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Decision Support Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Decision Support Systems.

Countries where authors publish in Decision Support Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Decision Support Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Decision Support Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Support Systems more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026