W. Mende

33 papers receiving 987 citations

Peers

W. Mende
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Pharmacy 199
  • Developmental Biology 58
  • Atmospheric Science 350
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 180
  • Paleontology 77
Replace Richard H. Miller with:
Richard H. Miller United States
Ignacio Martı́nez Spain
Annette Witt Germany
P. Bruscaglioni Italy
Juan G. Roederer United States
Laurance R. Doyle United States
Susanne Ditlevsen Denmark
R. E. Novak United States
Matthias Franz Germany
Woodruff T. Sullivan United States
W. Mende relative to Richard H. Miller United States Richard H. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Richard H. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Mende

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Mende's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Mende with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Mende more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Mende

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Mende. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Mende. The network helps show where W. Mende may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Mende, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Mende Line = papers co-authored together W. Mende links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000213
2 2001161
3 1990137
4 200298
5 199789
6 198672
7 198762
8 199448
9 200944
10 199019
11 201114
12 200610
13 200010
14 20059
15 20208
16 19968
17
[The Forensic Psychiatric Documentation System (FPDS). Development and initial application in penal expertise].
19878
18
Heliospheric Modulation over the past 10,000 Years as de- rived from Co smogenic Nuclides
20037
19 19996
20
[On the criminology of depressive disorders].
19676

About W. Mende

W. Mende is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Health and Development (11 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (199 citations), Developmental Biology (58 citations), Atmospheric Science (350 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (180 citations) and Paleontology (77 citations). W. Mende has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Wermke, Rita Stellmacher, J. Beer, Hanspeter Herzel, P. Bruscaglioni, Claudia Manfredi, Jürg Beer, Peter W. Kubik, P. Holgate and Raimund Muscheler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Land Degradation and Development, Physics Letters A and Space Science Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact