Countries where authors publish in Space Science Reviews
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Space Science Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Space Science Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Space Science Reviews more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Space Science Reviews
This network shows the impact of papers published in Space Science Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Space Science Reviews.
About Space Science Reviews
The 4.2k papers published in Space Science Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 173.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Space Science Reviews usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (3.6k papers), Instrumentation (142 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (459 papers), Geophysics (332 papers) and Atmospheric Science (324 papers) specifically the topics of Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1.8k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1.7k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.4k papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (783 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (677 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (600 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (298 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (272 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Space Science Reviews are V. Angelopoulos, C. T. Russell, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, S.‐I. Akasofu, James E. Hansen, Larry D. Travis, D. V. Reames, M. J. Buonsanto and L. F. Burlaga.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.