Space Science Reviews

4.3k papers and 166.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Space Science Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 166.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Space Science Reviews usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (3.7k papers), Molecular Biology (620 papers) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (476 papers) specifically the topics of Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1.8k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1.7k papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Space Science Reviews are V. Angelopoulos, D. V. Reames, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, C. T. Russell, S.‐I. Akasofu, James E. Hansen, Larry D. Travis, M. J. Buonsanto and L. F. Burlaga.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Space Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Space Science Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Space Science Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Space Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Space Science Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Space Science Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Space Science Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025