Norbert Nedopil

1.6k citations
79 papers · 696 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Norbert Nedopil

74 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

Norbert Nedopil
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Clinical Psychology 484
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 30
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 101
  • Sociology and Political Science 280
Replace Clemens Cording with:
Clemens Cording Germany
Christopher G. Fichtner United States
Menachem Krakowski United States
Hans‐Joachim Haug Switzerland
Anu Putkonen Finland
E. Gunilla Stålenheim Sweden
Oğuz Karamustafalıoğlu Türkiye
Christian Huchzermeier Germany
M. Bosc France
Jean Chambry France
Norbert Nedopil relative to Clemens Cording Germany Clemens Cording's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Clemens Cording · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Nedopil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Nedopil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Nedopil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Nedopil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Nedopil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Nedopil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Nedopil. The network helps show where Norbert Nedopil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Norbert Nedopil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norbert Nedopil Line = papers co-authored together Norbert Nedopil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200657
2 201349
3 201045
4 201236
5 198431
6 200724
7 200524
8 198323
9 197923
10 200621
11 201420
12 200519
13 201619
14 200118
15 200418
16 201015
17 200614
18 201513
19 200112
20 199610

About Norbert Nedopil

Norbert Nedopil is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (30 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (25 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (19 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (16 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (484 citations), Biological Psychiatry (22 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (101 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (280 citations). Norbert Nedopil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cornelis Stadtland, Michael Osterheider, Hartmut A.G. Bosinski, Henning Saß, E. Rüther, Alexander Kurz, Susanne Stübner, Carolin Kröner, Andreas Mokros and Janine Diehl‐Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, Artificial Organs and International Journal of Forensic Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact