W. Landers

1k citations
14 papers · 484 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

W. Landers

14 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

W. Landers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 76
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 249
  • Artificial Intelligence 151
  • Hardware and Architecture 19
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 22
Replace Ming Fang with:
Ming Fang China
Gaolei Hu Hong Kong
Ken Giewont United States
James D. Gourlay United Kingdom
Sandeepan DasGupta United States
Bin Shi Netherlands
Thomas J. Bucelot United States
Shuyu Yang United States
Yiwei Peng United States
W. Landers relative to Ming Fang China Ming Fang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Ming Fang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Landers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Landers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Landers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Landers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Landers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Landers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Landers. The network helps show where W. Landers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Landers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Landers Line = papers co-authored together W. Landers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2006100
2 2011100
3 202269
4 202265
5 202126
6 200221
7 200420
8 200620
9 200418
10 200416
11 200415
12 20126
13 20145
14 20153

About W. Landers

W. Landers is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 14 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Copper Interconnects and Reliability (6 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (1 paper) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (76 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (249 citations), Artificial Intelligence (151 citations), Hardware and Architecture (19 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (22 citations). W. Landers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chandrasekharan Kothandaraman, K. Petrarca, Subramanian S. Iyer, Timothy D. Sullivan, Richard Volant, F. Chen, John Safran, Cornelia K. Tsang, Paul S. Andry and Edmund J. Sprogis. Their work appears in journals such as Quantum Science and Technology, Physical Review Letters, Science Advances, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium proceedings and IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact