Nathan Abrams

522 citations
22 papers · 379 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Abrams

21 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Nathan Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 361
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 88
  • Artificial Intelligence 75
  • Computer Networks and Communications 16
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 4
Replace Philip Amberg with:
Philip Amberg United States
Shuoyi Zhao China
Alexander Gazman United States
Stanley Cheung United States
Weiwei Zhu China
L. Stampoulidis Greece
Dessislava Nikolova United States
Carol Reinholm United States
Jonathan Leu United States
David M. Calhoun United States
Nathan Abrams relative to Philip Amberg United States Philip Amberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Philip Amberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Abrams. The network helps show where Nathan Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201977
2 201955
3 201953
4 202050
5 201930
6 202030
7 202024
8 201710
9 20159
10 20218
11 20228
12 20187
13 20184
14 20203
15 20183
16 20163
17 20251
18 20231
19 20181
20 20241

About Nathan Abrams

Nathan Abrams is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ocean Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (17 papers), Optical Network Technologies (14 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (9 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (3 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (2 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (361 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (88 citations), Artificial Intelligence (75 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (16 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (4 citations). Nathan Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Keren Bergman, Qixiang Cheng, Madeleine Glick, Yu‐Han Hung, Padraic E. Morrissey, Peter O’Brien, Liang Dai, Meisam Bahadori, Xiang Meng and Sébastien Rumley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Lightwave Technology, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, Photonics Research, Physical review. C and IEEE Sensors Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact