Udo Nabitz

22 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Udo Nabitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Health Information Management 75
  • Management Information Systems 130
  • Strategy and Management 118
  • General Health Professions 140
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 61
Replace R. W. G. FOSTER with:
R. W. G. FOSTER United States
Sholom Glouberman Canada
Heidi Boerstler United States
Marie‐Claire Richer Canada
Manuela S. Macinati Italy
R.T.J.M. Janssen Netherlands
Mattia J. Gilmartin United States
Rose Gollop United Kingdom
William N. Żelman United States
Anna Prenestini Italy
Udo Nabitz relative to R. W. G. FOSTER United States R. W. G. FOSTER's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. W. G. FOSTER · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Udo Nabitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Nabitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Nabitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Nabitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Nabitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Nabitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Nabitz. The network helps show where Udo Nabitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Udo Nabitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Udo Nabitz Line = papers co-authored together Udo Nabitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000122
2 200881
3 199955
4 201144
5 201342
6 200741
7 200135
8 200534
9 201232
10 200626
11 200021
12 200919
13 201618
14
EFQM's new excellence model
199912
15 200510
16 201210
17 20163
18 20232
19 20082
20 20051

About Udo Nabitz

Udo Nabitz is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Quality and Management Systems (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (75 citations), Management Information Systems (130 citations), Strategy and Management (118 citations), General Health Professions (140 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (61 citations). Udo Nabitz has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Niek Klazinga, J.A. Walburg, Wim van den Brink, Paul Jansen, Maarten W.J. Koeter, Kees Ahaus, Isabelle Fabbricotti, Robbert Huijsman, Mirella Minkman and Gerard M. Schippers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Evaluation and Program Planning, PLoS ONE and Public Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact