Kees Ahaus

68 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Kees Ahaus
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Management Information Systems 415
  • Health Information Management 107
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 33
  • Strategy and Management 343
  • General Health Professions 265
Replace Peter O’Neill with:
Peter O’Neill Australia
Simon Bishop United Kingdom
Johan Thor Sweden
Pamela Mazzocato Sweden
Charles R. Gowen United States
Mattias Elg Sweden
Ramin Ravangard Iran
Federico Lega Italy
Sharon Schweikhart United States
Kathleen L. McFadden United States
Kees Ahaus relative to Peter O’Neill Australia Peter O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Peter O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kees Ahaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees Ahaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees Ahaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees Ahaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees Ahaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees Ahaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees Ahaus. The network helps show where Kees Ahaus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kees Ahaus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kees Ahaus Line = papers co-authored together Kees Ahaus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011196
2 2007110
3 200894
4 201489
5 201086
6 201262
7 200957
8 201149
9 201442
10 202141
11 201637
12 201234
13 201730
14 200830
15 202128
16 202227
17 202225
18 201723
19 201421
20 201319

About Kees Ahaus

Kees Ahaus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (7 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (7 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (415 citations), Health Information Management (107 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (33 citations), Strategy and Management (343 citations) and General Health Professions (265 citations). Kees Ahaus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Robbert Huijsman, Mirella Minkman, Jiju Antony, Rini van Solingen, Manda Broekhuis, Ronald J. M. M. Does, Klaus W. Wendt, Albert Trip, Udo Nabitz and Isabelle Fabbricotti. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Internet Research and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact