Trevor Howe

23 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Trevor Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 411
  • Pharmacology 181
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 302
  • Organic Chemistry 328
  • Molecular Biology 717
Replace Jens‐Uwe Peters with:
Jens‐Uwe Peters Switzerland
Frank E. Blaney United Kingdom
Robert A. Volkmann United States
Steven D. Wyrick United States
Anabella Villalobos United States
Richard B. Westkaemper United States
Dino Montanari Italy
Stephen A. Hitchcock United States
Vincenzo Tortorella Italy
Phil Jeffrey United Kingdom
Trevor Howe relative to Jens‐Uwe Peters Switzerland Jens‐Uwe Peters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jens‐Uwe Peters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trevor Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trevor Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor Howe. The network helps show where Trevor Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trevor Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trevor Howe Line = papers co-authored together Trevor Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005392
2 1997354
3 2001127
4 200168
5 199768
6 200961
7 199653
8 200842
9 200925
10 199022
11 200618
12 200518
13 200416
14 20099
15 19947
16 20026
17 19945
18 19885
19 20114
20 19972

About Trevor Howe

Trevor Howe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Synthesis of β-Lactam Compounds (3 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (411 citations), Pharmacology (181 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (302 citations), Organic Chemistry (328 citations) and Molecular Biology (717 citations). Trevor Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Vianello, Benoît De Boeck, Claire Mackie, Kantharaj Ethirajulu, Gabriele Cruciani, Emanuele Carosati, Joseph P. Tizzano, Craig R. Salhoff, James A. Monn and Rebecca A. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Tetrahedron Letters, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry and British Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact