Benoît De Boeck

1.1k citations
19 papers · 796 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît De Boeck

17 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Benoît De Boeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Pharmacology 182
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 199
  • Organic Chemistry 263
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 39
  • Spectroscopy 89
Replace Thomas Gaillard with:
Thomas Gaillard France
Iiris Kahn Estonia
Svava Ósk Jónsdóttir Denmark
Ekaterina V. Varlamova Ukraine
Todor S. Pavlov Bulgaria
Paul Jackson United Kingdom
Daniel Dubé Canada
Johannes A. H. Schwöbel Germany
Iurii Sushko Germany
Guang Lin United States
Benoît De Boeck relative to Thomas Gaillard France Thomas Gaillard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
Thomas Gaillard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît De Boeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît De Boeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît De Boeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît De Boeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît De Boeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît De Boeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît De Boeck. The network helps show where Benoît De Boeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît De Boeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît De Boeck Line = papers co-authored together Benoît De Boeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2005393
2 2003106
3 199449
4 201137
5 200434
6 199526
7 199823
8 199321
9 200418
10 201718
11 200415
12 199813
13 200112
14 199811
15 19927
16 20235
17
State of the art on hydrogen passive auto-catalytic recombiner (european union Parsoar project)
20015
18 19902
19 19951

About Benoît De Boeck

Benoît De Boeck is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pharmacology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radical Photochemical Reactions (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (3 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Pyrroles (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (2 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2 papers) and Combustion and Detonation Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (182 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (199 citations), Organic Chemistry (263 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (39 citations) and Spectroscopy (89 citations). Benoît De Boeck has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Vianello, Kantharaj Ethirajulu, Emanuele Carosati, Trevor J. Howe, Claire E. Mackie, Gabriele Cruciani, Gerald Pattenden, Heinz G�nter Viehe, Zdeněk Janoušek and Geert Mannens. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Engineering and Design, Tetrahedron, Tetrahedron Letters, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact