Spectroscopy

1.2M papers and 30.5M indexed citations i.

About

1.2M papers covering Spectroscopy have received a total of 30.5M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications and also cover the fields of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Some of the most active scholars covering Spectroscopy are Matthias Mann, E.M. Southern, Gail Lorenz Miller, Ad Bax, John A. Pople, Ruedi Aebersold, Richard R. Ernst, Frank Neese, Ben Zhong Tang and Kurt Wüthrich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Spectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Spectroscopy.

Countries where authors publish papers about Spectroscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Spectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Spectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spectroscopy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025