Stephen Cooper

4.4k citations
117 papers · 3.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Cooper

106 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Stephen Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Computer Science Applications 2.4k
  • Software 365
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
  • Media Technology 470
  • Information Systems 671
Replace Lynda Thomas with:
Lynda Thomas United Kingdom
Linda Werner United States
Natalie Rusk United States
Mordechai Ben‐Ari Israel
Beth Simon United States
Raymond Lister Australia
Alexander Repenning United States
David Weintrop United States
Lauri Malmi Finland
Shuchi Grover United States
Stephen Cooper relative to Lynda Thomas United Kingdom Lynda Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lynda Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cooper. The network helps show where Stephen Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts
2000358
2 2003287
3 2015282
4
Learning to program with Alice
2004183
5 2004166
6 2004112
7 2010109
8 2003102
9 201488
10 200381
11 201674
12 200064
13 201957
14 200955
15 200154
16 200350
17 201548
18 201047
19 201447
20 200346

About Stephen Cooper

Stephen Cooper is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Information Systems and Media Technology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (60 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (19 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (11 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (10 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (9 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (2.4k citations), Software (365 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations), Media Technology (470 citations) and Information Systems (671 citations). Stephen Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Wanda Dann, Randy Pausch, Roy Pea, Shuchi Grover, Barbara Moskal, Deborah Lurie, John Maloney, Michael Kölling, Ian Utting and Mitchel Resnick. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Applied Physics Letters, ACM Transactions on Computing Education and Film Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact