Tomas Furmark

11.2k citations
140 papers · 8.5k · h-index 55

Impact in

Papers in

Tomas Furmark

132 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

Tomas Furmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Applied Psychology 1.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.8k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 586
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.4k
Replace Jens Blechert with:
Jens Blechert Austria
Leah H. Somerville United States
Hedy Kober United States
Mike Rinck Netherlands
Greg J. Siegle United States
Christopher G. Beevers United States
Jack B. Nitschke United States
Rudolf Stark Germany
Philippe R. Goldin United States
Adriana Galván United States
Tomas Furmark relative to Jens Blechert Austria Jens Blechert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jens Blechert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Furmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Furmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Furmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Furmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Furmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Furmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Furmark. The network helps show where Tomas Furmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Furmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomas Furmark Line = papers co-authored together Tomas Furmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002407
2 2006305
3 2002298
4 1999295
5 2005295
6 2001284
7 2012274
8 2007244
9 2013211
10 2009207
11 2004196
12 2002193
13 2010185
14 2005173
15 2008165
16 2012159
17 1998143
18 1997142
19 2018138
20 2015126

About Tomas Furmark

Tomas Furmark is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 140 papers that have together received 8.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (73 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (24 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (20 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (18 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (15 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.8k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (586 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.5k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.4k citations). Tomas Furmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maria Tillfors, Gerhard Andersson, Mats Fredrikson, Per Carlbring, Håkan Fischer, Ína Marteinsdóttir, Mats Fredrikson, Bengt Långström, Lisa Ekselius and Andreas Frick. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy, PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact