Benjamin Bohman

32 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers

Benjamin Bohman
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Applied Psychology 158
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 246
  • Pharmacy 25
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
  • Speech and Hearing 21
Replace Shelley van der Veek with:
Shelley van der Veek Netherlands
Alinne Z. Barrera United States
Katherine Taylor United States
Kirsti Riiser Norway
Selena T. Nguyen‐Rodriguez United States
Ronald J. Prince United States
Douglas W. Billings United States
Kim van Zoonen Netherlands
Kristine H. Luce United States
Jacqueline M. Bailey Australia
Benjamin Bohman relative to Shelley van der Veek Netherlands Shelley van der Veek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Shelley van der Veek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Bohman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Bohman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Bohman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Bohman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Bohman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Bohman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Bohman. The network helps show where Benjamin Bohman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Bohman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Bohman Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Bohman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009206
2 201574
3 201656
4 201236
5 201935
6 201434
7 201329
8 201727
9 201625
10 201823
11 201322
12 201316
13 202315
14 201614
15 202211
16 201310
17 20179
18 20219
19 20219
20 20177

About Benjamin Bohman

Benjamin Bohman is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Pharmacy and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (13 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (158 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations) and Speech and Hearing (21 citations). Benjamin Bohman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Finn E Rasmussen, Ata Ghaderi, Elinor Sundblom, Lars Forsberg, Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Gisela Nyberg, Gerhard Andersson, Åsa Norman, Per Tynelius and Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Journal of Sleep Research and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact