Philip Lindner

3.1k citations
89 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Lindner

80 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Philip Lindner
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Applied Psychology 541
  • Human-Computer Interaction 497
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 455
  • Clinical Psychology 537
  • Social Psychology 248
Replace Greg M. Reger with:
Greg M. Reger United States
Verónica Guillén Spain
Alessandra Gorini Italy
Oswald D. Kothgassner Austria
Javier Fernández‐Álvarez Spain
Patrice Renaud Canada
Anna Felnhofer Austria
Mar Rus‐Calafell United Kingdom
Katharina Meyerbröker Netherlands
Conxa Perpiñá Spain
Philip Lindner relative to Greg M. Reger United States Greg M. Reger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Greg M. Reger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Lindner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Lindner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Lindner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Lindner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Lindner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Lindner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Lindner. The network helps show where Philip Lindner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Lindner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Lindner Line = papers co-authored together Philip Lindner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016154
2 2018133
3 2017130
4 2019113
5 2016104
6 201695
7 201993
8 201986
9 202072
10 202056
11 202048
12 202047
13 201347
14 202047
15 202044
16 201943
17 201537
18 202035
19 201735
20 201735

About Philip Lindner

Philip Lindner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (19 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (16 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (541 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (497 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (455 citations), Clinical Psychology (537 citations) and Social Psychology (248 citations). Philip Lindner has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Per Carlbring, Gerhard Andersson, Alexander Miloff, William Hamilton, Lena Reuterskiöld, Tine Nordgreen, David Forsström, Anne H. Berman, Ekaterina Ivanova and Magnus Johansson. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Trials and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact