О. Гефверт

1.5k citations
19 papers · 1.2k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

О. Гефверт

18 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

О. Гефверт
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 695
  • Biological Psychiatry 74
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 243
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 262
  • Clinical Psychology 275
Replace Wolfgang Fleischhacker with:
Wolfgang Fleischhacker Austria
J. Fritze Germany
Jacob S. Ballon United States
V.B. Tuason United States
Harm J. Gijsman Netherlands
Hisanobu Kaiya Japan
Joseph F. Lipinski United States
J. Alexander Bodkin United States
Pavel Mohr Czechia
Iluminada Corripio Spain
О. Гефверт relative to Wolfgang Fleischhacker Austria Wolfgang Fleischhacker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wolfgang Fleischhacker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by О. Гефверт

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of О. Гефверт's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by О. Гефверт with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites О. Гефверт more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by О. Гефверт

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by О. Гефверт. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by О. Гефверт. The network helps show where О. Гефверт may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside О. Гефверт, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with О. Гефверт Line = papers co-authored together О. Гефверт links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1999288
2 2003253
3 1999213
4 1998128
5 200193
6 200588
7 199960
8 199824
9 200320
10 199515
11 20029
12 19987
13 20005
14 19973
15 19982
16 19962
17
Psykiatri. En orienterande översikt.
20061
18 19981
19 19981

About О. Гефверт

О. Гефверт is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (695 citations), Biological Psychiatry (74 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (243 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (262 citations) and Clinical Psychology (275 citations). О. Гефверт has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bengt Långström, Leif Lindström, Tomas Furmark, Ína Marteinsdóttir, M Fredrikson, Maria Tillfors, Mariëlle Eerdekens, G Hagberg, W. Chrzanowski and W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, NeuroImage, Biological Psychiatry and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact