Tom Booth

8.3k citations
138 papers · 3.1k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Booth

129 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Tom Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Radiation 334
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 486
  • Clinical Psychology 701
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 598
  • Applied Psychology 148
Replace John L. Black with:
John L. Black United States
Jonathan M. Links United States
K. Hirose Japan
Hauke Bartsch United States
Edwin Lee Hong Kong
Ryan Smith United States
Cees Jonker Netherlands
Vincent J. Cunningham United Kingdom
O. Grimm Germany
M. Mandelkern United States
Tom Booth relative to John L. Black United States John L. Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
John L. Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Booth. The network helps show where Tom Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Booth Line = papers co-authored together Tom Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015195
2 2003181
3 2018160
4 2012129
5 2013119
6 2013111
7 2013107
8 201488
9 198475
10 201571
11 201369
12 201468
13 201367
14 201866
15 201162
16 201354
17 201551
18 202048
19 200647
20 201945

About Tom Booth

Tom Booth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 138 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (18 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (11 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (334 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (486 citations), Clinical Psychology (701 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (598 citations) and Applied Psychology (148 citations). Tom Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Aja Louise Murray, Ian J. Deary, Karen McKenzie, Paul Irwing, John M. Starr, Renate Kuenssberg, Mark E. Bastin, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Alan J. Gow and Marco Del Giudice. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Neurobiology of Aging, Personality and Individual Differences, Assessment and Journal of Computational Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact