Tom Booth

138 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Tom Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Radiation 362
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 500
  • Clinical Psychology 643
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 558
  • Applied Psychology 135
Replace Hans Knutsson with:
Hans Knutsson Sweden
Masaaki Tanaka Japan
John L. Black United States
J.C. Gatenby United States
Ralf Schulze Germany
D.M. Sheppard Australia
K. Hirose Japan
Diana L. Miglioretti United States
Weili Lin United States
Jonathan M. Links United States
Tom Booth relative to Hans Knutsson Sweden Hans Knutsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Hans Knutsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Booth. The network helps show where Tom Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Booth Line = papers co-authored together Tom Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015199
2 2003191
3 2018171
4 2012164
5 2013124
6 2013115
7 2013111
8 201493
9 198482
10 201574
11 201473
12 201372
13 201172
14 201871
15 201370
16 201355
17 202054
18 201553
19 201949
20 200649

About Tom Booth

Tom Booth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 147 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (21 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (19 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (12 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (11 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (11 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (362 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (500 citations), Clinical Psychology (643 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (558 citations) and Applied Psychology (135 citations). Tom Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Aja Louise Murray, Ian J. Deary, Karen McKenzie, Paul Irwing, John M. Starr, Marco Del Giudice, Renate Kuenssberg, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Mark E. Bastin and J.S. Hendricks. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Neurobiology of Aging, Assessment, Journal of Computational Physics and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact