Aidan G.C. Wright
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Personality Traits and Psychology
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 121
- Personality Traits and Psychology 76
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 12
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 69
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 15
- Co-authors
- Christopher James Hopwood (46 shared papers)Aaron L. Pincus (27 shared papers)Robert Frank Krueger (29 shared papers)Kristian E. Markon (20 shared papers)Leonard J. Simms (20 shared papers)Michael N. Hallquist (35 shared papers)Emily B. Ansell (9 shared papers)Katherine M. Thomas (14 shared papers)
- Journals
- Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment (30 papers)Journal of Abnormal Psychology (24 papers)Assessment (23 papers)Clinical Psychological Science (15 papers)Journal of Personality (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Aidan G.C. Wright
292 papers receiving 16.8k citations
Aidan G.C. Wright's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Clinical Psychology 11.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4k
- Applied Psychology 651
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1k
- Social Psychology 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Aidan G.C. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Aidan G.C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aidan G.C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aidan G.C. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aidan G.C. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aidan G.C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aidan G.C. Wright. The network helps show where Aidan G.C. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aidan G.C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 307 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 2216 |
| 2 | Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 985 |
| 3 | The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 385 |
| 4 | 2012 | 362 | |
| 5 | The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 358 |
| 6 | Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 357 |
| 7 | A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 297 |
| 8 | 2012 | 282 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 280 | |
| 10 | Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 266 |
| 11 | 2012 | 256 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 254 | |
| 13 | The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 241 |
| 14 | 2010 | 217 | |
| 15 | Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice. Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 217 |
| 16 | Personalized Models of Psychopathology Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 203 |
| 17 | Narcissism Today: What We Know and What We Need to Learn Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 202 |
| 18 | 2013 | 198 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 198 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 197 |
About Aidan G.C. Wright
Aidan G.C. Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 307 papers that have together received 17.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (121 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (76 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (69 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (21 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (15 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (12 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (11.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4k citations), Applied Psychology (651 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1k citations) and Social Psychology (1.2k citations). Aidan G.C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher James Hopwood, Aaron L. Pincus, Robert Frank Krueger, Kristian E. Markon, Leonard J. Simms, Michael N. Hallquist, Emily B. Ansell, Katherine M. Thomas, Nicole M. Cain and Johannes Zimmermann. Their work appears in journals such as Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Assessment, Clinical Psychological Science and Journal of Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.