Assessment

89.5k citations
2.2k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Personality Traits and Psychology
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Papers in

    • Psychological Testing and Assessment 155
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 451
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 402
    • Personality Traits and Psychology 224
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 217

Assessment

2.0k papers receiving 84.5k citations

Peers

Assessment
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Clinical Psychology 49.6k
  • Applied Psychology 7.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 18.2k
  • Social Psychology 15.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 9.4k
Replace Clinical Psychology Science and Practice with:
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice United States
British Journal of Clinical Psychology United Kingdom
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment United States
The Lancet Psychiatry United Kingdom
Depression and Anxiety United States
World Psychiatry United States
Journal of Behavioral Medicine United States
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy United Kingdom
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics United States
Psychiatry United States
Assessment relative to Clinical Psychology Science and Practice United States Clinical Psychology Science and Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Assessment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Assessment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Assessment.

About Assessment

The 2.2k papers published in Assessment in the last decades have received a total of 89.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Assessment usually cover Applied Psychology (318 papers), Clinical Psychology (1.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (654 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (350 papers) and Social Psychology (368 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (451 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (402 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (261 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (248 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (224 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (217 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (155 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Assessment are Ruth A. Baer, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer Krietemeyer, Delroy L. Paulhus, Daniel N. Jones, Kenneth A. Wallston, Vaughn G. Sinclair, Richard Rogers, Aidan G.C. Wright and Brett T. Litz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact