Assessment

83.8k citations
2.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
    • Personality Traits and Psychology

Papers in

    • Psychological Testing and Assessment 156
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 447
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 397
    • Personality Traits and Psychology 221
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 215

Assessment

2.0k papers receiving 79.8k citations

Peers

Assessment
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Clinical Psychology 46.6k
  • Applied Psychology 6.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17.2k
  • Social Psychology 14.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 8.9k
Replace Clinical Psychology Science and Practice with:
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice United States
British Journal of Clinical Psychology United Kingdom
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment United States
Depression and Anxiety United States
Journal of Behavioral Medicine United States
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy United Kingdom
The Lancet Psychiatry United Kingdom
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology United States
European Journal of Personality United States
Journal of Anxiety Disorders United States
Assessment relative to Clinical Psychology Science and Practice United States Clinical Psychology Science and Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Assessment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Assessment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Assessment.

About Assessment

The 2.2k papers published in Assessment in the last decades have received a total of 83.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Assessment usually cover Applied Psychology (319 papers), Clinical Psychology (1.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (649 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (345 papers) and Social Psychology (365 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (447 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (397 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (259 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (247 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (221 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (215 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (156 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Assessment are Ruth A. Baer, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer Krietemeyer, Delroy L. Paulhus, Daniel N. Jones, Vaughn G. Sinclair, Kenneth A. Wallston, Richard Rogers, Brett T. Litz and Bradley N. Axelrod.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact