Tina Coldham

535 citations
13 papers · 332 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Tina Coldham

13 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Tina Coldham
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Health Professions 179
  • Public Administration 16
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 12
  • Clinical Psychology 45
Replace Rebekah Zincavage with:
Rebekah Zincavage United States
Steven Dodd United Kingdom
Kate Karban United Kingdom
Frances Gordon United Kingdom
Susan Waller Australia
Caroline Norrie United Kingdom
Rosalie Pockett Australia
Anna M. Houston United Kingdom
Steven Keen United Kingdom
Jeannette Waegemakers Schiff Canada
Tina Coldham relative to Rebekah Zincavage United States Rebekah Zincavage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rebekah Zincavage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Coldham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Coldham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Coldham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Coldham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Coldham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Coldham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Coldham. The network helps show where Tina Coldham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tina Coldham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tina Coldham Line = papers co-authored together Tina Coldham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2021106
2 200656
3 200749
4 200648
5 202133
6 202214
7 20109
8 20225
9
An Evaluation of the Impact of the Social Care Modernisation Programme on the Implementation of Direct Payments London
20064
10
Students and service users learning together: Co-operative inquiry and its implications for curriculum development
20043
11 20142
12 20232
13 20251

About Tina Coldham

Tina Coldham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers), Global Health and Surgery (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (179 citations), Public Administration (16 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (12 citations) and Clinical Psychology (45 citations). Tina Coldham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Judith Lathlean, Lucy Simons, Colin Gibson, Tracy Levett‐Jones, Stephen Tee, Abigail Burgess, Peter Beresford, Sophie Staniszewska, Mary Chambers and Gary Hickey. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Frontiers in Public Health, Nurse Education in Practice and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact