Stephen Tee

1.1k citations
32 papers · 705 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Tee

31 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers

Stephen Tee
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Research and Theory 48
  • Leadership and Management 12
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 44
  • General Health Professions 177
  • Sociology and Political Science 314
Replace Pamela J. Springer with:
Pamela J. Springer United States
Pamela N. Clarke United States
Stefanos Mantzoukas Greece
Constance L. Milton United States
Mary de Chesnay United States
Verena Tschudin United Kingdom
Denise J. Drevdahl United States
Gweneth Hartrick Doane Canada
Karien Jooste South Africa
Justin Andrews Canada
Stephen Tee relative to Pamela J. Springer United States Pamela J. Springer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Pamela J. Springer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Tee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Tee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Tee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Tee. The network helps show where Stephen Tee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Tee Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Tee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016153
2 201787
3 200655
4 201954
5 200453
6 200646
7 202033
8 201126
9 201622
10 202120
11 201518
12 202017
13 202016
14 202015
15 201813
16 201912
17 201610
18 201910
19 20178
20 20167

About Stephen Tee

Stephen Tee is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (48 citations), Leadership and Management (12 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (44 citations), General Health Professions (177 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (314 citations). Stephen Tee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Yeter Sinem Üzar‐Özçetin, Judith Lathlean, Melanie Birks, Janet Scammell, Robyn Cant, Lea Budden, Tracy Levett‐Jones, Abigail Burgess, Tina Coldham and Colin Gibson. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, International Journal of Nursing Sciences, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact