Thomas Kabir

7.4k citations
39 papers · 444 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kabir

33 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Thomas Kabir
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 143
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 130
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • Human-Computer Interaction 33
Replace Christian Rauschenberg with:
Christian Rauschenberg United Kingdom
Rohan Morris United Kingdom
Carla McEnery Australia
D Schwartze Germany
Devika Fiorillo United States
Josie Billington United Kingdom
Antoine Urech Switzerland
Manuel Waldorf Germany
Andrew Devendorf United States
Helene Amundsen Nissen‐Lie Norway
Thomas Kabir relative to Christian Rauschenberg United Kingdom Christian Rauschenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Christian Rauschenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kabir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kabir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kabir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kabir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kabir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kabir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kabir. The network helps show where Thomas Kabir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kabir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kabir Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kabir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018118
2 202345
3 202132
4 202028
5 202217
6 202115
7 201615
8 201714
9 201114
10 202313
11 202412
12 202211
13 202111
14 201910
15 202210
16 20199
17 20208
18 20238
19 20238
20 20206

About Thomas Kabir

Thomas Kabir is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (22 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (143 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (130 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (33 citations). Thomas Kabir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, E Bethan Davies, Rachel Churchill, Stephanie Sampson, Tania Gergel, Victoria Betton, André Tomlin, Lucy Simons and Kathy Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Psychological Medicine, Trials, Health Expectations and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact