Thomas Kabir

7.6k citations
42 papers · 479 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kabir

35 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

Thomas Kabir
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Applied Psychology 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 87
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Clinical Psychology 90
Replace Christian Rauschenberg with:
Christian Rauschenberg United Kingdom
Carla McEnery Australia
Thies Lüdtke Germany
Akira Ikemi Japan
Manuel Waldorf Germany
David A. Lynch United States
Thole H. Hoppen Germany
Andrew Devendorf United States
Kate Gee United Kingdom
Steven L. Bistricky United States
Thomas Kabir relative to Christian Rauschenberg United Kingdom Christian Rauschenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Christian Rauschenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kabir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kabir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kabir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kabir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kabir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kabir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kabir. The network helps show where Thomas Kabir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kabir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kabir Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kabir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018121
2 202348
3 202132
4 202028
5 202219
6 202317
7 202117
8 201616
9 201114
10 201714
11 202213
12 202413
13 202112
14 202312
15 202210
16 201910
17 202310
18 20199
19 20208
20 20227

About Thomas Kabir

Thomas Kabir is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (109 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations) and Clinical Psychology (90 citations). Thomas Kabir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Rachel Churchill, Debbie Butler, André Tomlin, Stephanie Sampson, E Bethan Davies, Kathy Chapman, Katherine Easton and Chris Hollis. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, BMJ Open, The Lancet Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact