Jay Watts
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Psychology top 5%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 3
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 2
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 3
- Co-authors
- Stefan Priebe (3 shared papers)Aleksandra Matanov (1 shared paper)Alan Costall (1 shared paper)Jörg Zinken (1 shared paper)Angela Sweeney (1 shared paper)Tina Coldham (1 shared paper)Jo Lomani (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet Psychiatry (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)International Review of Psychiatry (1 paper)The British Journal of Social Work (1 paper)Bioethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jay Watts
12 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 210
- Social Psychology 197
- Psychiatry and Mental health 73
- General Health Professions 123
- Reproductive Medicine 36
Countries citing papers authored by Jay Watts
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Watts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Watts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Watts. The network helps show where Jay Watts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jay Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 |
About Jay Watts
Jay Watts is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (210 citations), Social Psychology (197 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (73 citations), General Health Professions (123 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (36 citations). Jay Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Priebe, Aleksandra Matanov, Alan Costall, Jörg Zinken, Angela Sweeney, Tina Coldham and Jo Lomani. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, International Review of Psychiatry, The British Journal of Social Work and Bioethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.