Tim Chater
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 8
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 7
- Co-authors
- Rebecca Palmer (6 shared papers)Cindy Cooper (10 shared papers)Nicholas Latimer (4 shared papers)Steven A. Julious (4 shared papers)Pam Enderby (4 shared papers)Munyaradzi Dimairo (2 shared papers)Marian Brady (2 shared papers)Audrey Bowen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Health Technology Assessment (3 papers)BMJ Open (3 papers)European Journal of Cancer (3 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Age and Ageing (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenNepal
In The Last Decade
Tim Chater
22 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Rehabilitation 192
- Occupational Therapy 42
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
- Cognitive Neuroscience 177
- Psychiatry and Mental health 95
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Chater
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Chater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Chater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Chater more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Chater
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Chater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Chater. The network helps show where Tim Chater may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Chater, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Tim Chater
Tim Chater is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (192 citations), Occupational Therapy (42 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (95 citations). Tim Chater has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Palmer, Cindy Cooper, Nicholas Latimer, Steven A. Julious, Pam Enderby, Munyaradzi Dimairo, Marian Brady, Audrey Bowen, Madeleine Harrison and Elizabeth Cross. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, BMJ Open, European Journal of Cancer, BMC Public Health and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.