Tim Chater

1.3k citations
23 papers · 623 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Chater

22 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Tim Chater
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Rehabilitation 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 173
  • Occupational Therapy 28
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
Replace Diane Ames with:
Diane Ames United Kingdom
Kristine Kingsley United States
Grethe Eilertsen Norway
Sally Eames Australia
Deok-Ju Kim South Korea
Justin J. Needle United Kingdom
N Girish India
Fabiana Caetano Martins Silva e Dutra Brazil
Ton Satink Netherlands
Rachel Botell United Kingdom
Tim Chater relative to Diane Ames United Kingdom Diane Ames's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Diane Ames · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Chater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Chater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Chater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Chater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Chater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Chater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Chater. The network helps show where Tim Chater may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Chater, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Chater Line = papers co-authored together Tim Chater links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019131
2 200977
3 201761
4 200847
5 201847
6 201942
7 202041
8 201134
9 200923
10 201618
11 201117
12 201316
13 201815
14 201715
15 201912
16 20227
17 20226
18 20206
19 20223
20 20203

About Tim Chater

Tim Chater is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (173 citations), Occupational Therapy (28 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). Tim Chater has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Palmer, Cindy Cooper, Nicholas Latimer, Pam Enderby, Steven A. Julious, Madeleine Harrison, Munyaradzi Dimairo, Audrey Bowen, Marian Brady and Elizabeth Cross. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, PLoS ONE and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact