Gail Mountain

5.9k citations
136 papers · 3.5k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Gail Mountain

129 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Gail Mountain
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Rehabilitation 519
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Occupational Therapy 279
  • General Health Professions 1.7k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 79
Replace Cheryl Cott with:
Cheryl Cott Canada
Monique A. M. Gignac Canada
Basia Belza United States
Gerd Ahlström Sweden
Laraine Winter United States
Marit Kirkevold Norway
Graeme Hawthorne Australia
Alvisa Palese Italy
Anders Kottorp Sweden
Mary Ann McColl Canada
Gail Mountain relative to Cheryl Cott Canada Cheryl Cott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Cheryl Cott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Mountain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Mountain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Mountain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Mountain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Mountain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Mountain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Mountain. The network helps show where Gail Mountain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gail Mountain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail Mountain Line = papers co-authored together Gail Mountain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008292
2 2017222
3 2013209
4 2017156
5 2020124
6 2014121
7 201594
8 200884
9 201483
10 202081
11 200976
12 201271
13 202064
14 200663
15 201758
16 201655
17 201853
18 201345
19 201445
20 201042

About Gail Mountain

Gail Mountain is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (35 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (35 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (17 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (17 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (16 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (14 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (13 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (519 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Occupational Therapy (279 citations), General Health Professions (1.7k citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (79 citations). Gail Mountain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark Hawley, Claire Craig, Bridgette Wessels, Esme Moniz‐Cook, Liz Brewster, Rabih Chattat, Nasrin Nasr, Jack Parker, Dianne Gove and Bob Woods. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, BMJ Open and Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact