Gill Windle

74 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Gill Windle's Hit Papers

A methodological review of resilience measurement scales 2011 · 1.5k citations
1.5k0+5+10Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Gill Windle
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Clinical Psychology 2.1k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 109
  • Applied Psychology 340
  • Health 435
  • Conservation 115
Replace Jaclene A. Zauszniewski with:
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski United States
Gail Wagnild United States
Jane Parkinson United Kingdom
Allison Williams Canada
Jenny Secker United Kingdom
Ruth Tennant United Kingdom
Helen Herrman Australia
Marit Kirkevold Norway
Karin Dahlberg Sweden
Sharon Danoff‐Burg United States
Gill Windle relative to Jaclene A. Zauszniewski United States Jaclene A. Zauszniewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Windle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Windle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Windle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Windle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Windle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Windle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Windle. The network helps show where Gill Windle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gill Windle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gill Windle Line = papers co-authored together Gill Windle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Hit paper breakdown →
20111528
2
What is resilience? A review and concept analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
20101132
3 2010245
4 2008163
5 2012162
6 201680
7 201773
8 200470
9 201664
10 201552
11 200949
12 201748
13 201447
14 200446
15 201246
16 202039
17 202230
18 202129
19 200729
20 201928

About Gill Windle

Gill Windle is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Health and Conservation, having authored 83 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (6 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (6 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (109 citations), Applied Psychology (340 citations), Health (435 citations) and Conservation (115 citations). Gill Windle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kate Bennett, Jane Noyes, Bob Woods, David Markland, Ian Russell, Pat Linck, Dyfrig Hughes, Robert Grant, Ann Bowling and Matthew Hankins. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMJ Open, The Gerontologist and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact