Thomas Frank

1.7k citations
62 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Frank

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 991
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 234
  • Ceramics and Composites 61
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 252
  • Biomedical Engineering 280
Replace Jenn‐Gwo Hwu with:
Jenn‐Gwo Hwu Taiwan
K. Ishii Japan
Hosun Lee South Korea
Bing‐Yue Tsui Taiwan
Kazuyoshi Torii Japan
Yue Gu China
Motoyasu Terao Japan
P. Fazan United States
Chenming Hu United States
Jörgen Olsson Sweden
Thomas Frank relative to Jenn‐Gwo Hwu Taiwan Jenn‐Gwo Hwu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jenn‐Gwo Hwu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Frank. The network helps show where Thomas Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Frank Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997247
2 1996185
3 2007154
4 201289
5 201165
6 200856
7 200745
8 200138
9 200138
10 200536
11 200129
12 201620
13 200318
14 200817
15 201915
16 201715
17 200514
18 201714
19 200613
20 199813

About Thomas Frank

Thomas Frank is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (25 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (23 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (13 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (8 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (6 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (6 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (991 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (234 citations), Ceramics and Composites (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (252 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (280 citations). Thomas Frank has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Pensl, Norbert Schwesinger, Helmut Wurmus, H. Itoh, T. Troffer, M. Schadt, H. P. Strunk, J. Heindl, Markus Maier and Michael Weidner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Physica B Condensed Matter, Applied Physics A, Journal of Applied Physics and physica status solidi (b).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact