Physica B Condensed Matter

32.8k papers and 374.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 32.8k papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter in the last decades have received a total of 374.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter usually cover Materials Chemistry (13.2k papers), Condensed Matter Physics (12.0k papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (11.9k papers) specifically the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5.5k papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4.8k papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physica B Condensed Matter are J. Rodrı́guez-Carvajal, Wenfang Xie, Qingzhong Xue, F. Yakuphanoğlu, A. S. Wills, Sumio Iijima, H.C. Swart, C.K. Jayasankar, Z.H. Dughaish and Magdy A. Ezzat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter.

Countries where authors publish in Physica B Condensed Matter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physica B Condensed Matter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physica B Condensed Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physica B Condensed Matter more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025