Psychology of Women Quarterly

2.0k papers and 87.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 87.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly usually cover Gender Studies (1.0k papers), Sociology and Political Science (783 papers) and Clinical Psychology (502 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (493 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (322 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (266 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology of Women Quarterly are Barbara L. Fredrickson, Tomi-Ann Roberts, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Janet Shibley Hyde, NiCole T. Buchanan, Mary P. Koss, Rhoda K. Unger, Sarah E. Ullman, Nita Mary McKinley and Alice H. Eagly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology of Women Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology of Women Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology of Women Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology of Women Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025