Stephen E. Flower
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Sulfur Compounds in Biology
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 10
- Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection 9
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Sensors 3
- Co-authors
- Tony D. James (16 shared papers)John Fossey (9 shared papers)Xuhong Qian (3 shared papers)Xiaolong Sun (3 shared papers)Steven D. Bull (2 shared papers)Juyoung Yoon (1 shared paper)Qingling Xu (1 shared paper)John P. Lowe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chemical Communications (2 papers)Chemical Science (2 papers)RSC Advances (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)RSC Chemical Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen E. Flower
21 papers receiving 657 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Spectroscopy 346
- Biochemistry 130
- Bioengineering 81
- Materials Chemistry 254
- Physiology 110
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Flower
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Flower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Flower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Flower. The network helps show where Stephen E. Flower may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 204 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 3 |
About Stephen E. Flower
Stephen E. Flower is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Bioengineering, Environmental Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (9 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (5 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (3 papers), Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (2 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (2 papers) and Advanced Glycation End Products research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (346 citations), Biochemistry (130 citations), Bioengineering (81 citations), Materials Chemistry (254 citations) and Physiology (110 citations). Stephen E. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tony D. James, John Fossey, Xuhong Qian, Xiaolong Sun, Steven D. Bull, Juyoung Yoon, Qingling Xu, John P. Lowe, Gyoungmi Kim and Suying Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Chemical Science, RSC Advances, Scientific Reports and RSC Chemical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.