Mark P. Thomas

19 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Mark P. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Public Administration 114
  • General Health Professions 103
  • Strategy and Management 56
  • Political Science and International Relations 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 117
Replace Hajo Holst with:
Hajo Holst Germany
Malay Majmundar United States
Rachel Fyall United States
Devi Sacchetto Italy
Steffen Lehndorff Germany
Adam Mrozowicki Poland
Milan J. Dluhy United States
Alison Barnes Australia
Ron Callus Australia
Ted Richmond Canada
Mark P. Thomas relative to Hajo Holst Germany Hajo Holst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hajo Holst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark P. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark P. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark P. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark P. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark P. Thomas. The network helps show where Mark P. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark P. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark P. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Mark P. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Interrogating the new economy : restructuring work in the 21st century
201035
2
Power and everyday practices
201231
3 201526
4 200925
5
Regulating Flexibility: The Political Economy of Employment Standards
200919
6 201918
7 201117
8 201714
9 201114
10 201414
11 201112
12 201411
13 201011
14
Socialist Studies Études socialistes
20116
15 20204
16 20193
17 20172
18 20181
19 20211
20 20201

About Mark P. Thomas

Mark P. Thomas is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (2 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (114 citations), General Health Professions (103 citations), Strategy and Management (56 citations), Political Science and International Relations (76 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (117 citations). Mark P. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Steven Tufts, Norene Pupo, Leah F. Vosko, John Grundy, Rebecca Raby, Eric Tucker, John Perry, Kiran Mirchandani, Rebecca Casey and Christopher Paolini. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Political Economy, Labour / Le Travail, Work Employment and Society, The Economic and Labour Relations Review and Antipode.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact