Stephen C. Walker

613 citations
8 papers · 474 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Stephen C. Walker

8 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 379
  • Statistics and Probability 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 186
  • Education 104
  • Linguistics and Language 14
Replace Rachelle M. Bruno with:
Rachelle M. Bruno United States
MJ Snowling
K.P. Van den Bos Netherlands
Michael Thomson United Kingdom
Isabelle Comte-Gervais France
Matti Leiwo Finland
Leilani Sáez United States
Sina Wu China
Jason Chor Ming Lo Hong Kong
Catherine C.-C. Lam Hong Kong
Stephen C. Walker relative to Rachelle M. Bruno United States Rachelle M. Bruno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rachelle M. Bruno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Walker. The network helps show where Stephen C. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1999461
2
Critical Knowledge and Skill for Educational Diagnosticians: The Development of a Policy Statement by the Council for Educational Diagnostic Services.
19953
3 19923
4 19892
5 20202
6 19971
7 20241
8
Are Teaching Effectiveness and Retention Influenced by Various Routes to Special Education Certification
20111

About Stephen C. Walker

Stephen C. Walker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper), Language Development and Disorders (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (379 citations), Statistics and Probability (126 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (186 citations), Education (104 citations) and Linguistics and Language (14 citations). Stephen C. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rachelle M. Bruno. Their work appears in journals such as Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, The Journal of Asian Studies, Journal of Chinese Religions, Diagnostique and TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact