Stephen C. Walker

613 citations
8 papers · 455 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Stephen C. Walker

7 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 393
  • Statistics and Probability 123
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Education 103
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
Replace Rachelle M. Bruno with:
Rachelle M. Bruno United States
MJ Snowling
Michael Thomson United Kingdom
P. Been Netherlands
Pamela E. Hook United States
K.P. Van den Bos Netherlands
Dorthe Klint Petersen Denmark
Leilani Sáez United States
Christos Skaloumbakas Greece
Sina Wu China
Stephen C. Walker relative to Rachelle M. Bruno United States Rachelle M. Bruno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rachelle M. Bruno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Walker. The network helps show where Stephen C. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1999442
2
Critical Knowledge and Skill for Educational Diagnosticians: The Development of a Policy Statement by the Council for Educational Diagnostic Services.
19953
3 19923
4 19892
5 20202
6 20241
7 19971
8
Are Teaching Effectiveness and Retention Influenced by Various Routes to Special Education Certification
20111

About Stephen C. Walker

Stephen C. Walker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Discipline and Inequality (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper), Cognitive Functions and Memory (1 paper) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (393 citations), Statistics and Probability (123 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations), Education (103 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations). Stephen C. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rachelle M. Bruno. Their work appears in journals such as Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, The Journal of Asian Studies, Journal of Chinese Religions, TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) and Diagnostique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact