Journal of Chinese Religions

278 papers and 476 indexed citations i.

About

The 278 papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions in the last decades have received a total of 476 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions usually cover Sociology and Political Science (249 papers), Cultural Studies (120 papers) and Religious studies (35 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (238 papers), Japanese History and Culture (119 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Chinese Religions are Paul R. Katz, Timothy Brook, Laurence G. Thompson, Vincent Goossaert, Russell Kirkland, John R. McRae, Yanfei Sun, Philip Clart, Livia Köhn and Adam Yuet Chau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Chinese Religions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Chinese Religions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Chinese Religions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Chinese Religions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025