Shane Walker
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Food Science top 2%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Papers in
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 5
-
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 5
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 5
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 2
- Co-authors
- Anne Gunson (5 shared papers)F. Roger Harker (3 shared papers)Shona H. Murray (2 shared papers)Ken B. Marsh (4 shared papers)H. Young (1 shared paper)Ian C. Hallett (1 shared paper)John H. Maindonald (1 shared paper)Elspeth MacRae (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (3 papers)Journal of Sensory Studies (3 papers)Food Quality and Preference (2 papers)International Journal of Food Science & Technology (1 paper)Acta Horticulturae (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Shane Walker
11 papers receiving 889 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Biochemistry 139
- Food Science 421
- Plant Science 619
- Sensory Systems 54
- Nutrition and Dietetics 172
Countries citing papers authored by Shane Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Shane Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shane Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shane Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shane Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shane Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shane Walker. The network helps show where Shane Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shane Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 267 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 254 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 132 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 92 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 0 |
About Shane Walker
Shane Walker is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, General Materials Science and Sensory Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Material Properties and Applications (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper) and Engineering Applied Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (139 citations), Food Science (421 citations), Plant Science (619 citations), Sensory Systems (54 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (172 citations). Shane Walker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anne Gunson, F. Roger Harker, Shona H. Murray, Ken B. Marsh, H. Young, Ian C. Hallett, John H. Maindonald, Elspeth MacRae, John H Prescott and Joanna Gamble. Their work appears in journals such as Postharvest Biology and Technology, Journal of Sensory Studies, Food Quality and Preference, International Journal of Food Science & Technology and Acta Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.