Sarah Wright

29 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sarah Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 783
  • Demography 191
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 64
  • Leadership and Management 25
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 110
Replace Emily M. Hunter with:
Emily M. Hunter United States
Hetty van Emmerik Netherlands
Salvatore Zappalà Italy
Jane Sturges United Kingdom
Adrian Madden United Kingdom
Caroline Knight Australia
Cynthia A. Thompson United States
Seung‐Wan Kang South Korea
Sara Jansen Perry United States
Luc W. Dorenbosch Netherlands
Sarah Wright relative to Emily M. Hunter United States Emily M. Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Emily M. Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wright. The network helps show where Sarah Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012257
2
Loneliness in the Workplace: Construct Definition and Scale Development.
2006199
3 2020151
4 2020130
5 2016121
6 2018101
7 200768
8 201150
9 201950
10 201346
11 201546
12 201642
13 201331
14 201827
15 200819
16 201519
17 202019
18 202217
19 200915
20 202115

About Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Management of Technology and Innovation, Demography and Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (18 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Management and Marketing Education (3 papers), Education and Work Dynamics (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (1 paper) and Stress and Burnout Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (783 citations), Demography (191 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (64 citations), Leadership and Management (25 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (110 citations). Sarah Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Marjolein Lips‐Wiersma, Anthony Silard, K. T. Strongman, Christopher D. B. Burt, Ryan K. Gottfredson, Emily Dunham Heaphy, Kathy Lund Dean, Bryan J. Dik, Jarrod M Haar and Jeanie M. Forray. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Higher Education, The Leadership Quarterly, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact