Sarah Wright

4.9k citations
51 papers · 4.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Wright

50 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Sarah Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 321
  • Physiology 1.6k
  • Aging 111
  • Neurology 346
  • Neurology 474
Replace Jude T. Deeney with:
Jude T. Deeney United States
Seok Min Jin United States
Akos A. Gerencser United States
Der‐Fen Suen Taiwan
Clément Gautier France
Shaida A. Andrabi United States
Stavit Drori Israel
Jakob D. Wikström Sweden
Shigeto Sato Japan
Sarah Wright relative to Jude T. Deeney United States Jude T. Deeney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Jude T. Deeney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wright. The network helps show where Sarah Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008709
2 1994336
3 2000272
4 1997243
5 2013238
6 1999204
7 2014204
8 2005201
9 2008190
10 1991134
11 2000134
12 2009120
13 2013119
14 2000110
15 200098
16 200887
17 199665
18 200664
19 199853
20 200951

About Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (15 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (4 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (4 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (3 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (321 citations), Physiology (1.6k citations), Aging (111 citations), Neurology (346 citations) and Neurology (474 citations). Sarah Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Russell E. Rydel, H. Michael Tucker, Steven Estus, Anthony D. Postle, Mark D. Wogulis, Elizabeth F. Brigham, Irene Griswold‐Prenner, Kevin D. Mills, Kenneth B. M. Reid and Pinky Drosten Kushner. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neuroscience and Journal of Neurochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact