Peter Seubert
Impact in
- Physiology top 1%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
- Physiology 10
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 10
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 3
- Co-authors
- Dale Schenk (5 shared papers)Robin Barbour (3 shared papers)Dora Games (3 shared papers)Ivan M. Lieberburg (3 shared papers)Carmen Vigo‐Pelfrey (1 shared paper)Francisco Coria (1 shared paper)Bruce L. Miller (1 shared paper)Ruth N. Motter (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurobiology of Aging (3 papers)Neurology (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)Nature Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandIreland
In The Last Decade
Peter Seubert
10 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peter Seubert's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Physiology 1.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 252
- Virology 25
- Neurology 42
- Neurology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Seubert
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Seubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Seubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Seubert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Seubert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Seubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Seubert. The network helps show where Peter Seubert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Seubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mutant presenilins of Alzheimer's disease increase production of 42-residue amyloid β-protein in both transfected cells and transgenic mice Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 1115 |
| 2 | 1995 | 199 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 109 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 9 | A-beta-42 and tau as markers of Alzheimers disease | 1996 | 1 |
| 10 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 1 |
About Peter Seubert
Peter Seubert is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Virology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (252 citations), Virology (25 citations), Neurology (42 citations) and Neurology (53 citations). Peter Seubert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Dale Schenk, Robin Barbour, Dora Games, Ivan M. Lieberburg, Carmen Vigo‐Pelfrey, Francisco Coria, Bruce L. Miller, Ruth N. Motter, Douglas Galasko and Ruth A. Dukoff. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Neurology, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Nature Medicine and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.